I see that. What elements of the original design were important to preserve?
The shoe really is an authentic bring-back. Honestly, we didn't switch much up besides changing the process a bit. We looked various models from the past, and upped it in some ways — particularly with the knee-high boot, elongating its spikes. It wasn’t the biggest success back then, but that's irrelevant, we felt like it would resonate with our times; it’s a one-to-one with a–slight–tweak on engineering.
How was that ethos carried on by the 56 looks presented tonight?
We have a couple of tracksuits and apparel pieces which were initially launched in the late sixties and seventies — it’s all about maintaining the clean design, the skeleton of the body, and then adjusting that model by extending a sleeve here, making the silhouette really long and narrow or the legs really wide so they sweep the floor there.. It's all in the details, the minor tweaks. That's what makes it contemporary while keeping it timeless. You look at it and feel really good because it's a classic but it's still updated for the right audience.
Last question before I let you run off — what synergies did you find between Alastair Mckimm's styling direction and your own perspective?
Oh, that's a good one. I didn't know what to expect because when creatives come together that's what usually happens. I don't know if he would agree but he might, I felt like we have a very similar understanding of aesthetics. We looked at things, saying, “No; yes; no,” until figuring out exactly what it was we wanted to say. It was very natural, fluid even. He's very structured, he's not a messy creative. For him, a structure paves the way for great ideas, and I'm the same. I noticed that in the first hour of working together and knew that it was going to be a lot of fun.
Major, congrats again!