Focalizing the Amalgam
The various stylistic elements of Downing’s work mentioned above, all done with impressive decisiveness, convey a confidence in concept that begs an examination of these disparate components — a process of excavation that aims to find a central synthesizing philosophy amidst the visual amalgam.
The most interesting aspect of the works — perhaps the very element of synthesis I am looking — is the presentation of relationship between idol and idolizer, one done through explicit means considering that each subject is donned in a respective NBA jersey. However, this relationship is presented through an organic and optimistic lens — a lens in contrast to what I’d instinctually expect after hearing this subject on the surface. This optimism, not only conveyed in concept, is achieved through visual qualities as well — I think of the bright color palette and breathtaking beauty of the subjects featured.
Furthering this optimistic lens is the amalgamated faces of the subjects — a visual code which would seem monstrous in a vacuum — that become arresting and gorgeous due to its visual context. However, the synthesized faces are not only visually striking, but serve a function: to focus the lens that examines the relationship between audience and celebrity.
The function it inherits is perhaps the most vital quality of the work — a fascinating proposal that when one idolizes a celebrity figure, they aren’t necessarily avoiding questions of self identity, rather, this relationship can help contribute to the exploration of a singular identity, using a larger-than-life figure as a reference point or mirror to oneself. But this show works best within the intrinsically paradoxical nature of the “singular identity” notion — is it not true that our identities are an amalgamation of experience and reference? I’d like to think the answer exists in the way Downing portrays faces.